Real-time workforce cognitive optimization and hyper-personalized learning through neuroscience

Open Hub

For HR, L&D and wellbeing leads · 50+ employees

Every employee is costing you €9–15K a year. None of it shows on a dashboard.

Burnout, disengagement, and training nobody finishes. EdCortex measures the loss against your own headcount — then recovers it for 1–2% of its value.

Book your free Cognitive Audit
Your annual exposure
€3.6M – €6.0M
People likely at risk
88
EdCortex, per year
€72,000
One prevented burnout exit costs about €75,000.Fewer than 1 prevented exit pays for the platform.

Assumes €50K average salary. Sources listed below.

Recognised by

UNESCO Global Education CoalitionBpifrance DeepTechFrench Tech SeedStation FNVIDIA InceptionAWS Activate

The problem

Cognition is the asset no one measures

Brain skills and brain health drive performance — yet neither is measured until the cost shows up as errors, absence and attrition.

Per employee · per year
€9–15K

the cost of the cognitive blind spot

For a 400-person site: €3.6–6M a year

Measured three ways — each figure is per employee, per year

Burnout & disengagement drain

rises with seniority: staff → managers → executives

€4K–19K
Am J Prev Med, 2025

One actively disengaged employee

18–34% of a €50K salary, in lost output and absence

€9K–17K
Gallup

Training that never lands

of ~€1,200 spent — 85% never engage with the platform

~€1,000
ATD 2025 · Gallup 2024

Overlapping measures of one loss — quoted as the conservative envelope, not summed.

Brain Skills + Brain Health = Brain Capital. EdCortex measures the loss, then recovers it — for 1–2% of it.

Lee et al., Am J Prev Med, 2025 ($3,999 hourly · $10,824 manager · $20,683 executive) · Gallup State of the Global Workplace (disengagement 18–34% of salary; 85% platform non-engagement, 2024) · ATD State of the Industry, 2025–26 ($846–1,254 training spend / employee).

Why it stays invisible

You already pay for tools that can't see this

Learning platforms measure completion. Engagement surveys measure mood. Neither measures cognition — so neither catches the loss before it becomes attrition.

Training platforms

  • Generic GenAI content
  • Same course, same pace, everyone
  • Completion ≠ competence
  • 85% never engage at all

Monitoring & surveys

  • One-size-fits-all questionnaires
  • Self-reported, twice a year
  • Data without an intervention
  • A dashboard, not an outcome

EdCortex

  • 32-trait cognitive profile per employee
  • Profile-specific, predictive interventions
  • Neuro-adaptive — 20% of staff are neurodivergent
  • Closed loop: measure → intervene → re-measure

What changes

One platform, three sets of outcomes

For the employee

Learning tuned to their own cognitive profile, a private coach, and full ownership of their brain-health data.

↑ completion
↓ cognitive fatigue
↓ time-to-productivity

For L&D

Turn your existing documents into adaptive courses — no authoring. Quizzes and assessments generated automatically.

↓ time-to-create
↑ skill-map coverage
↑ measurable competence

For HR & leadership

Real competency per role, anonymised wellbeing trends, and a defensible psychosocial-risk baseline.

↓ burnout & attrition
↑ upskilling ROI
audit-ready reporting

Before you ask

The three questions that usually stop this

“Our works council will block anything that profiles staff.”

Employees own their brain-health data. Employers see team-level aggregates only — nothing individual is ever extracted, so there is nothing for a works council to object to. We'll give you the consultation pack.

“Our data can't go into a commercial GenAI tool.”

It doesn't. Each client runs a dedicated, locally deployed language model. Zero leakage to third-party GenAI providers. GDPR-compliant and EU AI Act-ready by architecture, not by policy.

“We can't run a twelve-month procurement for this.”

You don't need to. Start with a two-month fixed-scope pilot on a single department, priced below most procurement thresholds. The pilot fee is credited in full if you convert.

Proof

Validated, deployed, and independently recognised

2,000 seats contractedWith a tier-1 European bank via its innovation programme — live from October 2026.
500+ participantsInstrument validated in partnership with PEAR Inc., a Harvard Medical / McLean affiliate.
UNESCO Global Education CoalitionMember organisation, contributing to Digital Learning Week 2026.
INRIA · Université de LorraineActive research partnerships underpinning the cognitive model.

Start here

See the cost against your own headcount

Thirty minutes, your own headcount, and a straight answer on what the blind spot is costing you — and what recovering it would take.